The ten-second version
Open Oxofolio, then run netstat, Activity Monitor or Resource Monitor while it is working. Nothing is listening and nothing is dialling out.
"Bank-level encryption in transit" is an answer to the wrong question. A document that leaves the machine has left your control, whatever happened to it on the way. Oxofolio does the work where the file already is — and every claim on this page is one you can check yourself in about ten minutes.
Stated as four separate things because vendors routinely deny the first and quietly do the other three.
| What we do not do | How it is enforced |
|---|---|
| No document telemetry What you open, how many pages, what you redact |
Impossible The application opens no sockets at all, so there is no channel for any of it to travel down. |
| No usage or feature tracking | Impossible Same reason. There is no analytics library in the shipped source, and a build that imported one would fail. |
| No licence call-home | By design A licence is an Ed25519 signature verified against a public key compiled into the application. Verification is arithmetic on your machine. There is no activation server and there never will be — one would contradict the product. |
| No update check | By design The application never asks whether a newer version exists. You update it when you choose to, from the download page. |
| Nothing is fetched at runtime | Bundled The Python sidecar and the OCR engine ship inside the installer and are the only executables launched. Nothing is downloaded, ever. |
The interface carries two links to this website — a feedback form and a research survey. Activating one hands the address to your operating system, which opens your own browser.
That browser then makes a request, and we can see it. The visit reaches our web server with your IP address, and a marker telling us it came from an installation rather than from the site. The application itself still opens no connection, and nothing about your documents is in the address.
We set this out because a page claiming "no network connections of any kind" while that existed would be answering the wrong question — and because a reviewer would find it anyway.
Every claim above is checkable on a machine you control, without our help and without telling us you are doing it. No web-based competitor can offer the same test.
Open Oxofolio, then run netstat, Activity Monitor or Resource Monitor while it is working. Nothing is listening and nothing is dialling out.
Start Wireshark on the machine. Point Oxofolio at a folder, unlock a batch of protected statements, compress them, redact identifiers and export. Filter for the process. There is nothing to see.
Pull the network cable, or block the application at the firewall, and do a full day's work. Every feature behaves identically, including licensing and OCR.
If a test does not behave as described, we would genuinely like to know — tell us. A claim that cannot survive being checked is not worth making.
Processing locally removes a whole class of question from a review. It does not make anybody compliant, and we do not sell it as doing so: compliance is a property of your processes, not of a tool.
| Framework | What local processing actually changes |
|---|---|
| DPDP Act, 2023 India |
You remain the Data Fiduciary. What changes is that no third-party processor enters the picture for the document work, so there is no processing agreement to hold and no transfer under section 16 to account for. |
| GDPR EU and UK |
We are neither controller nor processor for your documents, so a data processing agreement is not required for the software itself. There is no Chapter V transfer, because there is no transfer. Article 32 asks you to take appropriate measures — this is evidence toward that, not a discharge of it. |
| Professional confidentiality | The duty in your engagement letter is engaged whether or not personal data is involved. Local processing means no unassessed third party ever holds the file. |
| Sector rules | We make no claim about HIPAA, PCI DSS or any framework we have not been assessed against. If yours matters, send us your questionnaire and we will answer it in writing. |
None of this is legal advice, and no provision cited here has been reviewed by a practitioner on our behalf. What applies outside India covers the jurisdiction question in more detail.
There is no business model here that involves your documents. We sell a licence for software that runs on your machine.
Not "we choose not to" — there is no infrastructure that receives them. There is nothing to breach and nothing to subpoena.
Your licence is a signed file your own copy verifies offline. It does not check with anybody, so there is nobody whose absence could stop it.
This site records downloads and runs analytics if you allow it. The application you install does neither — the full privacy page keeps the two separate.
Architecture, data protection position, deployment notes and a completed vendor questionnaire — including the answers that are unfavourable. Published in full.
Where document processing actually leaks in a regulated firm, and what changes when it happens on the endpoint. Page and PDF.
Which parts of the product are jurisdiction-neutral, which ship configured for India, and why there is no data residency question.